Psychodynamic Therapy
Care organized around three things at once: the conflict a person cannot yet see clearly in themselves, the developmental history that built it, and the relationship in the room itself, which frequently reveals more about an old pattern than either person could describe from the outside.
Psychodynamic therapy is often assumed to be the slow, unfocused alternative to more structured treatment, a place to talk without a clear destination. The actual research does not support that reputation, and Dr. Esther Lapite-Garrett, the licensed psychologist who founded Alafiora, works from this approach as her primary way of practicing depth-oriented care, the umbrella orientation described in full on its own page. This page explains what psychodynamic therapy actually is, the specific evidence behind it, and exactly how it gets applied across the presentations this practice treats.
- What Psychodynamic Therapy Actually Is
- The Evidence Behind Psychodynamic Therapy
- Where Psychodynamic Therapy Applies, and Where It Does Not Stand Alone
- How Care Is Structured Here
- Frequently Asked Questions
No section by that word. The menu holds the complete site.
What Psychodynamic Therapy Actually Is
Unconscious Conflict, Developmental History, and the Relationship Itself
Psychodynamic Therapy Defined
Psychodynamic therapy works from three connected premises. First, that a person's present-day distress is frequently driven by a conflict operating outside full conscious awareness, a wish or a fear the person has not fully named to themselves, something running underneath the conscious thought sitting on top of it. Second, that this conflict has a developmental history: it formed somewhere, usually early, in relationships and circumstances that shaped what felt safe, allowed, or survivable at the time, and it has been operating on that same outdated logic ever since. Third, and distinctively, that the relationship between client and clinician is itself a source of clinical information, not simply the container care happens inside of. How a client relates to Dr. Lapite-Garrett in the room, what gets brought up easily and what gets skirted, often recreates in miniature the same relational pattern driving the presenting concern outside of it, and working with that recreation directly is part of the treatment itself, not incidental to it.
This is depth-oriented care's most extensively practiced and most extensively studied form. Where a presentation calls for cognitive or exposure-based technique alongside this work, per the practice's Evidence-Based Practice page, that technique gets applied inside this same relational frame rather than as a separate, disconnected program running alongside it.
A reputation built on assumption deserves the actual numbers behind it, not another restated claim of legitimacy.
The Evidence Behind Psychodynamic Therapy
Psychodynamic Therapy's Effect Sizes, Explained
The Research Behind an Approach Often Mistaken for Unproven
Psychodynamic therapy carries a substantial, direct body of outcome research behind it, not an assumed or inherited credibility borrowed from other approaches. A 2010 paper by Jonathan Shedler in American Psychologist, "The Efficacy of Psychodynamic Psychotherapy," reviewed eight separate meta-analyses spanning roughly 160 studies and reported an effect size of 0.97 at the end of treatment, a large effect by the field's own conventions, one that continued growing rather than fading afterward, reaching 1.51 at nine months or more after treatment ended. A further, more narrowly focused set of meta-analyses looking specifically at depression found a comparably large effect on depressive symptoms relative to waitlist or no-treatment comparison groups, with an effect size near 0.91. That same depression-focused literature, when it compares psychodynamic therapy directly against other active treatments rather than against a waitlist, finds it statistically indistinguishable from those treatments, not proven superior to them. A 2023 umbrella review by Leichsenring and colleagues in World Psychiatry, drawing specifically on meta-analyses published within the prior two years to test whether this evidence base still holds up under current scrutiny rather than resting on older data, reached the same conclusion: psychodynamic therapy's empirical support remains intact.
None of this makes psychodynamic therapy a rival claiming superiority over other well-supported approaches. It makes it a genuinely evidence-based approach in its own right, substantially outperforming inactive comparison conditions and holding up as good as, not proven superior to, therapies more commonly marketed as "empirically supported" when the two are compared directly, with a documented pattern, clients continuing to improve after treatment ends instead of plateauing at discharge, that is distinctive to this specific literature.
An honest limit of this research, stated plainly. No dedicated psychodynamic-specific outcome literature exists narrowly scoped to love obsession, compulsive sexual behavior, or sexual trauma as separately studied categories. The effect sizes above come from the broader psychodynamic outcome literature, largely built around depression, anxiety, and personality-level presentations, not from trials designed around these three domains specifically. Alafiora extends this general efficacy literature to love, sex, and trauma work through clinical reasoning, the same kind of hedged, honestly scoped extension the Evidence-Based Practice page already models for its own techniques, not through a claim that disorder-specific trials exist where they do not.
General effect sizes say something real about the approach as a whole, but what a specific client actually experiences depends on which of the three domains brought them in.
Where Psychodynamic Therapy Applies, and Where It Does Not Stand Alone
Unconscious Conflict Across Love, Sex, and Trauma
How Psychodynamic Therapy Applies to Each Domain This Practice Treats
In the Love domain, psychodynamic work addresses the relational root behind an obsessive fixation: an earlier attachment injury, an earlier blueprint for what closeness had to look like in order to feel bearable, usually formed long before the relationship currently provoking the pattern ever began. Because a limerent or love-addicted pattern usually traces back further than its current object, this history-and-relationship-focused work tends to carry more of the actual weight than a technique aimed only at managing today's fixation.
In the Sex domain, psychodynamic work asks what a compulsive pattern is defending against, the specific feeling, memory, or unbearable state the behavior exists to keep at bay, alongside a cognitive or somatic component where one is present, never instead of it. A specific, honest limit applies here. The literature on psychodynamic work with compulsive sexual behavior describes it as valuable for exploring core conflicts and developmental antecedents, the "why" underneath the pattern, but it does not, on its own, carry a standalone evidence base sufficient to treat compulsive sexual behavior as a stand-alone protocol. Psychodynamic work is one component of a multimodal approach for this specific presentation, not the entire treatment, and no claim on this page implies psychodynamic work alone is sufficient where the evidence does not support that.
In the Sexual Trauma domain, psychodynamic work addresses developmental history and unconscious repetition, a pull toward situations that echo an original harm, or a relationship pattern that keeps recreating an old injury without the person consciously choosing it, read specifically through the lens of what history produced the repetition and what the repetition is unconsciously trying to resolve. This is distinct from an approach that works by processing the feeling itself directly as it surfaces in the moment; this approach instead follows the history and the pattern of repetition back to its origin.
Across specific populations already served here, this same application plays out concretely. Leaders and Executives frequently arrive having already tried to out-manage a pattern through sheer competence and control, and psychodynamic work is often what finally locates the earlier relational template, frequently an early lesson that being needed was safer than being known, a lesson competence has been protecting against without ever being named directly, for years. Adults navigating a pattern that surfaced or intensified during college benefit from this same historical tracing, since a pattern that appears newly visible at nineteen or twenty is rarely newly formed at that age; psychodynamic work traces it to where it actually started, frequently a family system the client is only now old enough to see clearly from outside of it.
How Care Is Structured Here
Individualized Psychodynamic Work, Not a Fixed Interpretation
Peer Consultation and Solo-Practice Accountability
Psychodynamic work is not delivered as a scripted interpretation applied identically to every client who presents with a similar pattern. Every client's own unconscious material, history, and relational style are followed as they actually appear, not assumed in advance from a diagnosis or a category. No client is treated as a composite; the approach described on this page exists to sharpen what Dr. Lapite-Garrett is listening for, not to replace listening to a specific person directly.
Working without a supervisor is not the same as working without accountability. Regular peer consultation groups, ongoing clinical training, and Dr. Lapite-Garrett's own personal therapy exist for the same reason: her own life experience stays out of the room, and the work stays entirely about the client in front of her. Full session formats and current rates are detailed on the practice's Rates and Fees page, so cost is never a surprise walked into blind.
Understanding how psychodynamic work actually happens in session, before deciding to bring anything to it out loud, is why many of the people who eventually reach out read a page like this more than once first. A consultation is a brief conversation, held in confidence within the legal and professional limits of confidentiality any licensed psychologist explains before clinical work begins, built specifically to answer those questions before anything else is decided. Those already certain they are ready are equally welcome to begin directly with a first session, the actual start of care, where history and lived experience are gathered and a treatment plan begins to take shape.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Psychodynamic Therapy Actually Evidence-Based, or Just Traditional?The Research Behind an Approach Sometimes Assumed to Be Unproven
It is genuinely evidence-based, not merely traditional. Multiple meta-analyses spanning roughly 160 studies have measured its effects directly, with results comparable to therapies more commonly marketed under the "empirically supported" label, and a documented pattern of continued improvement after treatment ends rather than a plateau at discharge. The specific numbers and their sources are named directly above, not asserted without a citation.
How Long Does Psychodynamic Therapy Usually Take?
There is no fixed length set in advance. Because this approach follows a client's own material, including a genuinely unconscious conflict that has to be recognized before it can shift, the pace depends on what that specific person's history actually requires, not a standard number of sessions applied the same way to everyone. Some of the research behind this approach specifically shows benefits continuing to grow well after formal treatment ends, which is part of why a fixed session count would misrepresent how this work actually unfolds.
Can Psychodynamic Therapy Treat Compulsive Sexual Behavior on Its Own?
Not entirely on its own. Psychodynamic work is genuinely valuable for understanding what a compulsive pattern is defending against and where it came from, but the evidence behind treating compulsive sexual behavior specifically calls for a multimodal approach, psychodynamic work alongside cognitive and somatic technique, not psychodynamic work in isolation. Alafiora applies it as one part of a broader approach for this particular presentation, per the technique-flexible standard the Evidence-Based Practice page describes.
Does Focusing on the Client-Therapist Relationship Feel Strange or Uncomfortable?
Sometimes, at first, since most people are not used to a professional relationship being treated as clinically useful information in its own right. In practice this usually means noticing, together, patterns that show up in the room, hesitating to bring up a certain topic, expecting to be judged before anything has actually been said, and connecting those patterns to how they show up everywhere else in a client's life, not an unusual or invasive line of questioning.
Is Psychodynamic Therapy the Same as Old-Fashioned Psychoanalysis?
No, and this is a common point of confusion. Classical psychoanalysis involves multiple weekly sessions over years, historically conducted with the client reclining and the analyst out of view. Contemporary psychodynamic therapy, the approach described on this page, is far more flexible in format and pacing while retaining the same three core premises: unconscious conflict, developmental history, and the therapeutic relationship as clinical material.
Begin a Confidential Conversation
Understanding the actual evidence behind psychodynamic therapy, rather than the reputation it is often given secondhand, is a reasonable thing to want answered before deciding anything else, and asking does not commit anyone to more than the conversation itself. The consultation is a brief, confidential conversation, held within the legal and professional limits of confidentiality any licensed psychologist explains before clinical work begins, where questions about approach or fit get answered plainly and nothing about what brought someone here is judged or put on trial. Those already certain they are ready are equally welcome to begin directly with a first session, the actual start of the work that helps a pattern finally make sense instead of just repeating.
For anyone wanting the wider view this specific approach sits inside of, the Depth-Oriented Care page covers the umbrella orientation psychodynamic therapy is this practice's primary way of practicing, and this page can always be bookmarked, or the QR code in the footer scanned, to keep this practice's information close until the timing feels right.
Every session at Alafiora is held by one licensed psychologist
Dr. Esther Lapite-Garrett is the founder and sole practitioner of Alafiora. There are no associates, no rotating providers, and no case handoffs: the person who reads a client's history in the first session is the same person still holding it two years later. She is licensed in New Mexico and Indiana, with additional state licensure underway.
Her training is doctoral-level, which typically extends several years beyond a master's-level license in assessment, diagnosis, and the treatment of complex, overlapping presentations. She keeps a deliberately small caseload so that depth is possible, participates in ongoing peer consultation and clinical training, and maintains her own personal therapy.
Whatever brought someone to this page today is never put on trial here
A consultation is a brief conversation with no obligation attached. Those already certain they are ready are equally welcome to begin directly with a first session.